BBC Caught Fabricating News to Start a War [a Limited HangOut]

Yay!  Sunlight hits Manhattan buildings from 2, opposite directions. Impressive!

“Because today we live in a society in which spurious realities are manufactured by the media, by governments, by big corporations, by religious groups, political groups…So I ask, in my writing, What is real? Because unceasingly we are bombarded with pseudo-realities manufactured by very sophisticated people using very sophisticated electronic mechanisms…it is an astonishing power: that of creating whole universes, universes of the mind. I ought to know. I do the same thing.” Philip K Dick.


"The press has been routinely creating fake news reports to start a war. This is a serious issue for the press is conspiring against the people to create war, sell climate change, and rig elections. This is by no means something new. They taught me in high school history class about how the press started the Spanish-American War by reporting that the Spanish attacked a US ship, which never happened.".................  ............"The movie “Wag the Dog” was based on how things really operate. They used the press as a co-conspirator to manipulate the public. This is also why this election has resulted in the collapse in public confidence in the mainstream press. "

Source

obf comment: Although the movie “Wag the Dog” is briefly mentioned , nowhere does the article excerpted above mention perhaps the greatest modern real world example of the “Wag the Dog” criminal methodology, [i.e. the manufacture - on computers- of entirely faked imagery that is then broadcast as being authentic live video], which to my mind, was 9/11, when all 5 US MSM networks simultaneously broadcast 102 minutes of entirely faked [prefabricated on computers]"live" footage of a plane [Fl. 175] hitting a WTC tower, and[later] of the 2 main towers magically collapsing into their own "footprints" in record time.

So the few who understand the complete fraudulence of the "live" archived 9/11 imagery, myself included, would inevitably characterize this article as being a great example of a "limited hangout"

And lets not fergit, the very same B.B.C. is on record as announcing the total collapse of WTC 7 before it "officially" [time-wise],even happened :-)

And so it goes....

Regards, onebornfreeatyahoo

Postscript: of course, the fact of the matter is, that when the collapse of WTC7 was shown on US MSM, once again [ and as with the two preceding "live" collapses shown, of WTC2, then WTC1], the US stations involved broadcast fake, pre-manufactured imagery, not authentic live imagery of a collapse:






Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4Vrsjs_cLg

Fake Zapruder ['63] V. Fake Fox 5 [2001]

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BEsAkXVeVM

First of all, let me just mention that I am in no way a JFK assassination fact "freak" or expert, and so I have perhaps not seen many of the other videos that analyze the world famous Zapruder footage, but I have to say that this video is easily the best one I've seen to date, for a number of reasons.

1] It's short- only 10 minutes or so.

2] It is very clear and "to the point"

3] It analyses the Zapruder footage in a completely different way from what I've seen in other analyses':

 By analyzing the heretofore concealed layers of the movie, it shows it to be a composite of at least two layers, [presumably made from one original] ; where the foreground [ i.e JFK's limo etc.] and the background, [the spectators on the green], have been split off, then re-aligned, so that the original background and foregrounds were made to run out of synch with each other, thus creating a new, final  composite [i.e. what we now see as the Zapruder film]; that is, a false record of the events of that day, to hide whatever really did happen.

4] Zapruder Film Image Layering  Versus 9/11 Film Image Layering

My main point: the wholesale alteration of film imagery via an intricate layering process, although undoubtedly slower and more tedious to perform in the period 1963 -1975, I would assume, was obviously still doable back then [n.b.The Zapruder footage was not shown on network TV until until 1975 ] . 

The revealing of the fraudulent layering of the Zapruder movie to deliberately create  a false history is, I feel, very relevant to 9/11 and the alleged live TV video recordings of that day, as similar ,layering can be clearly seen in much of that allegedly "live" footage, also [ albeit computer generated]. 

For just one example, Simon Shack's analysis of the Fox5 video of Fl. 175's collision with WTC2 , clearly shows at least two extra  layers [not including the moving layer of the plane image itself] that were fabricated to create the fake "plane into building" footage broadcast "live" that morning on the Fox network:

                                  

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5-xcvv_fRQ&list=UUqfE8pqHQXLtP2oZY2NWDTA&index=48

And so it goes.....

"Layers of the onion", anyone?
 Regards, onebornfree.