Craig McKee's "Truth and Shadows" Blog: Yet Another Fake 9/11 Photo!

                                     

I see that Mr Craig McKee at the so-called "Truth and Shadows" blog is up to his old tricks- that is, his apparently ongoing policy of posting obviously fake 9/11 photos, such as the one above [proof to follow below].

 Controlled Opposition

But what did I expect from a self-described "9/11 truther" anyway?

After all, the whole aim of the 9/11 "truther" movement is to obfuscate and lead people away from any real 9/11 truth, for as long as possible. 

In other words, I could be wrong on this, but the entire 9/11 "truther" movement [Steven Jones, Judy Wood, Alex Jones, Morgan Reynolds, Richard Hall, Ace Baker, Pilots For 9/11 Truth, "Loose Change" etc. etc.] appears to be nothing more than a controlled opposition, as far as I can see.

 As such McKee's site is chock full of either knowing shills or useful idiot contributors [ e.g. Hybridrogue1, Ruffadam, Adam Syed, Onesliceshort, Senor ElOnce ] all involved in an ongoing self conglatuary, pseudo-intellectual, mutual masturbation fantasy of ongoing total and perpetual self-delusion and denial of the 9/11 imagery fakery that took place during and after those alleged events, and continues to this day, on a massive scale.

McKee: Scam Artist or "Useful Idiot"? 

Meaning, either Mr McKee is "in on it" and a knowing contributor to the ongoing obfuscation himself, or he is simply a schmuck, a"useful idiot". 

Given his revealed bias to allow the individuals named above the right to attack /character assassinate anyone who posts there concerning the issue of imagery fakery [as I tried to do for 6-8 months before being shown the door], I would have to say at this juncture that Mr McKee appears to be a knowing insider whose job is to deliberately mislead- and that that  is also the goal of the nasty little "nest" of above named characters who make up his regular blog contributors, several of whom I am still seriously considering tracking down and  "visiting" in order to determine whether he/she/ they are  real persons, and, if so,  possibly beating the living shit out of all or some of them - [i.e. my version of a short course in internet manners ].

 The Story So Far-The Prior Case of Craig McKee's  Claimed Self-Removing [Fake]Photo

Up until a couple of months ago Craig McKee's "Truth and Shadows" blog had the following image posted on its site in a sidebar, so you saw it  on the right side of the post [regardless of the subject matter of the actual post] every time you loaded the front page, sort of like this:

Just For [More] Fun!

Because, for me, the photo at right is an obvious fraud, for a bit of fun I started badgering him about it, to the point that he eventually removed it from his site.

When I noticed it was gone and questioned him about that, he claimed that effectively it had removed itself! [I kid you not :-)] and that he had nothing to do with it! 

Regardless, I had previously made him aware of the 8-10 other similar photos by linking to an article of my own. So if you wish to explore why I believe that this "award-winning photo " by one "Amy Sancetta" is a blatant fraud, click here for more info.

N.B.: Additional Evidence For The Sancetta Image Being Fake:

For the purposes of this article, [as I really want to draw your attention to the main subject of this post, i.e. the fake photo at the top of this page that Mr McKee currently has posted as a "genuine 9/11 photo"], all that I would add by way of commentary to what you'll find in my other post concerning the Sancetta [fake] photo is below, where I draw your attention to the almost perfect triangle , or chevron, of smoke that sits on top of the building below my red lines and question mark [ Q: does smoke really form in 2 almost perfectly straight lines  at a 90 degree angle, in real life? ]: 

And So, Onward and Upward! [to the main point of this article]:

First [again]   Craig McKee's "Truth and Shadows"  photo:

   

                                              

Photo Source? 

There are at least 2 sources for the still shot McKee used on his blog. Below are gifs, courtesy of Cluesforum.info , summarizing these possible sources. The names  Robert Clark,  Tina Cart,  refer to the original stills or videos from which the shots were extracted and then compared in the gif analysis done at  Cluesforum.info  :

[Here are links to original [or close to] sources from which the above gifs were extracted:  " Robert Clark , Tina Cart, 
[N.B. the very fact that these two photographers allegedly shot the exact same imagery, at the exact same moment in time, as evidenced by the picture perfect overlays achieved, should really be enough of a clue for anyone, even with half their brain tied behind their back, to the fact that these images are fraudulent, but for those of you with largely non-functioning brains, here below is yet more "in your face" evidence as to the blatant fakery of these images.]  
[N.B. 2, Also note the low resolution/definition of the original imagery, as compared to the re-rendered version posted at McKee's blog- see next image below.]

Why The McKee Photo Is Demonstrably Fake -The Beauty of Enhanced, Re- Rendered, Higher Definition, "Authentic" 9/11 Imagery!

So, obviously, the McKee/Truth and Shadows Photo is most likely from one of these two sources [i.e. Cart/ Clark] originally, but even if its not, it does not matter- its still a fake! 

Since the original 9/11 network and "amateur" videos and still photos were made public, in order to constantly reinforce the "reality" of the events of 9/11, the perps have found it necessary to improve the original, extremely poor quality and low resolution of all of that original imagery, [especially since 2007 ], and to constantly bombard the general public with this new improved imagery via its propaganda machine, the mainstream media.   

And so, to this day, the public is, via the usual mainstream media propaganda outlets, more or less continually hit with higher than original resolution "new" 9/11 images , which are in fact nothing more than re-renderings of the original low resolution imagery. The newer higher resolution photos/videos are supposed to convince us all that these photos/videos are real. [Question: why was ALL of the original footage and stills of such low quality? ]

What's nice about re-renderings [i.e. better image  resolution/definition by the perps, so it looks more "convincing" than the original]  is that it actually works against them, as it makes it even easier to spot the blatant fakery of the images, including this one!

  9/11 Video Fakery 101: Sunlight Does Not Lie!

So Is It [Sunlight direction/angle]? :

Or Is It? :

'Nuff Said? 

[Of course I do not expect Mr McKee and the assorted shills, clowns and doofii over at "Truth and Shadows" to ever "get" what's right in their faces- but do you, yet, dear reader?]

Regards, onebornfree. 

9/11 Predictive Programming Or Coincidence? - The Coup- Party Music- CD Cover -

Recent History: 

The original album cover of The Coup's ‘Party Music’ CD was apparently banned by retailers because it featured images of the the rap group blowing up the World Trade Centre twin towers.

Although the record was released on November 6th 2001 – almost two months after the tragic September 11th terrorist attacks – the cover was apparently created in June 2001. :

"...The cover art was finished in June 2001 and the album was scheduled to be released in mid-September. However, in response to the uncanny similarity of the artwork with the September 11, 2001, attacks, the album release was held back until alternative cover art could be prepared...."

Recently, on the 9/11 research site Septemberclues.info, contributor Edgewaters  commented:

"I'm sure you're familiar with the CD "Party Music" by the "Coup" and its cancelled front cover, which featured the towers exploding (at strangely prophetic locations). While the original cover was cancelled supposedly because it might be upsetting, they made sure a lot of people (who might otherwise never have seen it) got a good look at it by reporting on it and even displaying it. I remember the coverage. Because I already had some doubt in the back of my mind about the whole story, I was naturally curious, and went online to find out more. Now just the cover, perhaps if you were very inclined to believe the official story no matter what, you could chalk that up to pure coincidence. But if you did go look online you would find the inside jacket which again shows the towers - this time with 2 planes. At that point we're beyond coincidence. Further so if you take into account that one of the figures on the cover holds a detonator as the towers explode - which pretty much covers the two main theories that would emerge, bombs and plane strikes. The other figure holds a pair of conductors batons, like at an orchestra. Also the name of the group - "Coup" - predicts the "everything changed" theme."

"I think this was a message intended to reach those who might be skeptical. If you weren't skeptical, you didn't receive the message, but if you were skeptical, you went online and realized there was too much for coincidence here. And I think what happened to me, happened to a lot of people. You see the conductor batons, you see the bomb/plane thing, you see the foreknowledge, you see the smarmy grin of the guy with the detonator, and the whole thing comprises a display of awesome but hidden power - we can commit this crime right out in the open and you'll never even know who we are or how we did it, in fact, you're isolated, we've got everyone else marching to our tune, like a conductor. So you may as well go back to sleep cause there isn't anything you can do that will make any difference against the kind of power we have.

So that's just what I did! Not consciously, really, I'm analyzing this now in a conscious way but I didn't really perceive my reactions at the time.

This is how power is displayed now, I think. It's not just blunt and blatant violence. They demonstrate their control over the masses with the media, they demonstrate how covert and elusive their power is, they demonstrate your apparent isolation and marginilization. And all that IS a display of power, as much as any atrocity or act of violence. Moreso, even." 

Edgewaters comment pretty much echoed  one of my own thoughts regarding both Neo's passport expiration date [9/11/2001], plus the reference to the book entitled “Simulacra and Simulation”: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulacra_and_Simulation [ a 1981 book by the French philosopher Jean Baudrillard. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Baudrillard ], in the movie "The Matrix" ,  given  at the blog "Truth and Shadows" before I was banned there by the blog owner Craig McKee [silly little man]:

December 14, 2012 – 12:18 pm

Craig McKee said: “I knew about the book being in the movie, but I didn’t have much knowledge of the content of the book. Your comment has encouraged me to look deeper. What is your theory about the date on the passport?”

onebornfree said: "That it was deliberately inserted into the movie,[ as was the Baudrillard reference, obviously], by the movie makers themselves [ obviously chosen insiders], to send an “in plain sight” [but veiled] message to the plebiscite.

The perps are arrogant and basically saying to us all:

” we can do what we like- you people are mostly stupid; with current technology we can pre-fabricate an entire series of events, [i,e fake reality] complete with planes doing impossible things, and buildings collapsing top down at impossible speeds, then later broadcast it as a live event on MSM outlets, and still, almost everyone will believe it actually happened just as broadcast. We can even hint/tell you in advance what we are going to do, in movies like “The Matrix” and you are still all too stupid to see what’s coming down, or to prevent it. We can do whatever we like, whenever we like. As George Carlin said, we “got you by the balls”. ”: 

And, judging by the ongoing “yahoo” reaction to the proposition of network video fakery being primarily involved in the events of 9/11 as seen on this forum and elsewhere, I’d have to say that obviously they were/are absolutely correct [ which accounts for their arrogance ]  .

These people [whoever they may be] know exactly what they are doing, and exactly how stupid, boorish and trusting the US population in general is towards the MSM ,and exactly how far they can push “it”, without more than a few people discovering their methods."