The 9/11 Scam-The Faked "Live" MSM Imagery

"In your dream, 9/11 was not a scam" "Dreams [Matrix Blues]"Fake-Eye "D"

Obf sez: This addendum to Simon Shack's main work [ i.e. the original "September Clues"],  reveals, via close, detailed, frame by frame analysis, the complete fraudulence of  all of the original, as aired, mainstream news networks "live" 9/11, broadcasts; complete with impossible scenery perspectives, impossible building dimensions, fake "view from helicopter" shots, and an impossibly mobile bridge:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEM9quwi6yM

Please  closely review these other excellent additions to Simon Shack's original September Clues  movie available here 

See also my own:  

"9/11 Video Fakery: So Exactly Where Did Fl.175 Hit WTC2 ?"

 ....and : Fl. 175's Speed: Fairbanks [290+ mph] or Fox [540 + mph]?

*************************************************

The Operation Northwoods Scam:

[obf sez:  For those who still cling to the official 9/11 story and believe that it was/is impossible for their government to have planned an "inside job", the bare facts of the US government's now declassified, never implemented, 1962 Operation Northwoods scheme, complete with proposed fake plane flights, fake passengers, fake deaths/ and funerals, plus deliberate murder of US citizens, as revealed in this video, might get them to reconsider their own position vis a vis the claimed events of 9/11.]:

****************************

[Some of]My Music:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9-40CcWr4M

"Onebornfree" is also an Investment Philosophy Consultant, and, a Personal Freedom and Natural Health Consultant 

*******************************************

"The fact is that the average man's love of liberty is nine-tenths imaginary, exactly like his love of sense, justice and truth. He is not actually happy when free; he is uncomfortable, a bit alarmed, and intolerably lonely. Liberty is not a thing for the great masses of men. It is the exclusive possession of a small and disreputable minority, like knowledge, courage and honor. It takes a special sort of man to understand and enjoy liberty — and he is usually an outlaw in democratic societies." H.L. Mencken 

obf disclaimer: links to authors articles or videos are not necessarily full endorsements of all of the views/positions of any of the individuals or organizations concerned!

Comments/questions/insults/death threats etc. - email:  onebornfree at yahoo dot com

************************************

9/11 Scams: Real N.Y.C. Images Vs. Fake MSM 9/11 Media Broadcast Footage- Random Examples.

This post is mostly a reference file for some real pre-9/11 photos and videos that I have come across to date.

The only thing to note/compare really here is the superb resolution, clarity and detail of all of these original genuine images, even those  depicting the WTC's construction in black and white, and also, the complete absence of the strange, single or double black lines around  any of the scenery, unlike these two randomly selected stills immediately below from the alleged live 9/11 network footage.[Both image analyses , fig.s 1 & 2 below courtesy of Simon Shack . Click on images to enlarge].

Remember that these examples [Fig.s 1 and 2] of the alleged live network footage of  9/11 were supposedly captured via  network TV cameras where the cameras lens alone routinely cost between $8000 and $20000[!] [ Click on images to enlarge]:                                                          

                                                                     

                                                                              Fig.1

                                         

                                                       Fig. 2  

Above: An analysis of two "stills" taken from original, allegedly "live" network video feeds.[i.e.Typical MSM 9/11 image quality. Click on images to enlarge.]

                         
                                                                    Youtube link to video

Above- Fig. 3 A genuine pre-9/11 home movie. Note the complete lack of double black lines or similar, plus the overall clear resolution of all imagery in this video.



















     
Compare, Compare, Compare:                                                                                                                                                      

Now try and see if you can get anywhere near the same sort of image quality and resolution as captured by this small, handheld video camcorder in a genuine amateur video above, from
any  allegedly "live" 9/11 network video sequence depicting the Twin Towers etc. 

Remember in 2001, a "state of the art" camcorder was a probably a Sony camcorder costing maybe $2000 [ a guess], with nowhere near the capabilities of studio network cameras, where, as I mentioned before, the lens alone on those monsters cost anywhere between $8,000 and $20,000]!  

For example, as well as Figs. [1] and [2] above, see this gif file below from NBC's original "live" feed showing the collapse of WTC 2, : 

Fig. 4: An $8,000 to $20,000 NBC network camera lens in action on 9/11? [gif. made by Simon Shack from the original highest resolution MPEG format version of NBC's 9/11 archives, now re-archived in a lower {flv?}resolution format here]

Fig. 5 Still shot from MSNBC's "Live 911 footage" archive. A  state of the art network camera costing in the region of $20,000 [at least], took this ! This is after 9am on a clear sunny day, and yet it looks more like the break of dawn than anything else, here.

Below: various, random real, pre 9/11 photos [ Click on any image to enlarge it]:

   

                 

                            

               

                              

                                         

                                 

                            

                                     

                                         

                                               

And again , as a reminder, this [below] is just one completely atypical example [i.e. not an aberration] of the image quality from various alleged live network feeds broadcast on 9/11: 

This gif file was  made from an archived, supposedly genuine NBC "live, 9/11 video" sequence. Yeah, right. This  sample of the typical 9/11 MSM broadcast image quality [check for yourself] is so obviously fake its not even funny! [Or, it's funny to me, if you still believe it is actually a gif from genuine real time MSM footage, I suppose :-) ]. 

Study, Study, Study:

If you still believe it and others like it, are genuine, go back through the numerous real photos I have posted here, click on them at random to enlarge, then study them and compare the picture quality when compared with that of this gif or that of the two photos that started this post [Fig.s 1 and 2 ]. 

Conclusion: All of the "live" US MSM broadcast video footage of 9/11, for all channels, [CNN, CBS, ABC,NBC, Fox,], all 102 minutes of it , as now officially archived here, is in fact fake, pre-manufactured [on computer] imagery, not real live footage, as we were, are, and always will be, led to believe. 

Are we "there" yet? 

 Not "There" Yet? : The Sum of All The Evidence:

The poor quality of all of the "live" MSM 9/11 footage compared to regular live broadcasts [don't take my word for it- study the archived footage, closely yourself {officially archived here },  and compare with your own selection of genuine, pre-9/11 imagery] alone does not prove wholesale media fakery.

 Other factors must be seriously considered, such a the remarkably fortuitous timing of various alleged "live" edits and camera "zooms" in and out to capture the alleged live imagery  events of 9/11, or the repeated presence of doubled, or "ghosted" images, and the presence of large black lines around many buildings in numerous "live" original MSM archived sequences. 

Then there is the whole question of imagery [i.e the Verrazano Bridge]seen to be moving in stationary camera sequences, or appearing to be double or triple its actual size relative to other buildings in those sequences.

As an attempt at a "sum of all the evidence" type argument, I will post examples of these further types of proof of media fakery on 9/11,  either here as  updates, or in separate posts in the future.

                                  Regards, onebornfree.

Update 09/03/13: 
See related post on 9/11 MSM broadcast image quality : 

9/11 Scams:The Faked "Live" CNN WTC1 Collapse Footage

EVERY Pixel Of This Plane Flight Video Was Artificially Created!

[full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsxsDwFj6nE  ]

Many thanks to clues info forum researcher "Nonhocapito" for bringing this video to my attention. 

To directly quote Nonhocapito: 

"Everything is computer-generated in this video. The author labels this "very dangerous software in the wrong hands", but it is a coy comment. We know (and he knows) this has been "in the wrong hands" for quite a long time. [obf's emphasis] The only difference is that such a level is now available to anyone, or at least to anyone willing to put enough knowledge, time and money into it. 

On one hand, this could almost be good news, in the sense that with time a more compelling perception of the real depths of fakery could reach a wider public (at least the one educated in computer technology and video techniques). On the other, it can be discouraging to think how difficult it is becoming to pinpoint rendering flaws."

The creator of this video " The Faking Hoaxer" says : 

" A small test using new software. Nothing here is real apart from the sound. My god, very dangerous software in the wrong/right hands.  I think the sound makes it more real than it isn't." 

So the question remains, dear reader, do you really believe that this type of software [perhaps not as sophisticated but good enough] was not available to the military and government in 2001? 

regards, onebornfree.

4 Real 9/11 WTC2 Collapse Photos- Or..?

9/11 Video and Photographic Fakery-The Sum of All The Evidence- a Demonstration

[Original photo research by Simon Shack and "Equinox"]

Below are 2 allegedly real photographs [the first below is actually a video "still" from an alleged live video by a "Ben Reisman"], depicting an alleged early moment in the miraculous, almost instantaneous [under 20 sec.s]  collapse of  WTC2 on 9/11. Notice both are taken from near identical angles/perspectives and at almost the exact same instant in time. Yet one displays a lamp-post and the other does not. 

If you think that the nearer viewpoint of the 2nd photo [Sancetta] would explain that, try making a screen shot from the Reisman still that successfully excludes the lamp-post, and yet still includes the exact same portion of the pyramid-shaped roof and gold ball on top for the [lower]building situated directly in front of the black building, as is seen in the second photo [Sancetta]. Good luck with that! 

Still Not Convinced Something's Wrong?

Now if that does not convince you that something is wrong- I understand, after all it is possible that Sancetta was in front of the lamp-post when that shot was taken and that accounts for the difference. 

However, now compare both Sancetta and Resiman's photos with another alleged photo depicting the same event from a similar angle, the Nilsson photo [1] below]. [Forget about photo 2 below for the moment].

 Notice anything odd? 

Last of all,  compare the Nilsson photo[1] above, with the Samoilova photo [2] above. 

Are we there yet? Remember-  in the big picture, it's the sum of all the evidence that leads to an ultimate conclusion- not one piece of evidence in particular. 

Regards, onebornfree.

Addendum/Update 11/17/12: 

Yet more versions of the WTC2 collapse "family" of photographs, such as these two , as compared by September Clues researcher "reel deal" take special note of the marvelously cloned smoke pattern on the left side of the smaller photo that gets overlayed onto the larger one! : 

"you forgot to comp the streetlight & flagpole."

"dont matter, cloned the tree & dustcloud instead..."

  

Update 11/29/ 12:  Same Scene Now 8 Authors!

Would you believe that as revealed by September Clues forum researcher "Equinox", there are now at least 8 slightly different versions of  almost exactly the  same famous Sancetta image seen above [2nd. image from top], all somehow miraculously capturing the exact same moment in time? 

Below are stills of some of these additional images. Some stills are from new, allegedly live video that was released by N.I.S.T. in 2010 as part of it's "Cumulus" information release, supposedly as the result of  Freedom of Information [F.O.I.A.] motion by some person or group [if you can believe even that!]

A question for you: do you believe that it is at all likely that 8 different photographers all happened to be in almost the exact same spot on 9/11, and that all 8 [and possibly more!] happened to shoot the almost exact same event/moment in time as depicted in these photos and stills from various videos? And what about the conflicting scenery shown? How do you explain that? "Perspective issues" perhaps?

Regards, onebornfree.