Thursday, September 18, 2014

Get Ready For the Next Terror Attack - Paul Rosenberg

[ n.b. Article originally published May 21st, 2014]

"If I had to bet, I think I’d put my money on some type of “cyberwar” event coming in the not-too-distant future. But whether it’s that or something else, a new terror will be coming. That much is more or less inevitable.

                         

The reason is easy: We have people with control-biased minds in positions to create such events, or at least to make the most of them when they do occur.

The Problem

Put bluntly, our problem is that our current world systems place people with dominator minds into power over everyone else. We can call this the “alpha gorilla” model. These people need power over others. They get comfort and/or a thrill from dominance. And they certainly get rewards from it.

To illustrate, here’s an image I pulled from the newsfeed just this morning:




The faces and the slogans change, but the need to dominate drives such people into positions of power, whether it be in national governments, police enforcement, or bureaucracies that control other people’s movements. As Robert Heinlein wrote:

"Political tags, such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth, are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire."

Those who desire to control others, however, have a problem: In order to accomplish their “great ends,” they need the peaceful people – those who have no desire to dominate others – to obey them and to pay for their plans.

The problem with humans, however, is that they can think. Such beings don’t follow orders from random people; they must be convinced. And convincing free people to be subservient is hard. In order to dominate them, their ability to think must be overcome.

Once you have them obeying you, they’ll keep it up, no matter how silly, for a shockingly long period of time. But to get them to give up autonomy in the first place, or in some new way, is hard. Something that bypasses reason is required.

That thing, as you may have guessed, is fear.

We all saw this very clearly in 2001: Terrified people let the alpha gorillas take away their rights in the name of saving them from crazies. Some people objected, but not enough to sway events. Fear was in the air, the dominators promised safety, and most people either agreed or were too confused to object.

So, the structures of dominance became bigger and reached farther than ever before. This would not have happened without fear. Fear works.

The Great Enemy

Fear stands above all the other tools of human domination, even above legitimacy. That’s because fear overrides reason. Fear focuses our thoughts only on the object of terror. Then the alpha gorillas step in and promise to protect us, if only we will _____________ (fill-in the blank).

This game has been running for thousands of years, and it will be used again soon enough. There’s always a need for people to suspend thought and acquiesce to domination. And so long as life on Earth features structures of dominance, alpha-gorilla types will use them.

Even in daily life, the imposition of fear upon us is thick. Robert Ringer, commenting on getting ahead financially, correctly hit on this point when he said:

The results you produce in life are inversely proportional to the degree to which you are intimidated.

The Bible tells us that people are “all their lifetimes subject to bondage” because of fear.

Our great enemy is fear, and, unfortunately, systems for harnessing fear currently dominate life on this planet.

What Will Happen?


I don’t know which terrifying event will take place next, and whether this event will be staged or authentic matters very little. All that matters is that people are terrified, which gets their reasoning out of the way and gives the dominator types what they crave.

The antidote for this is for people to understand the con and to overcome their fear. Then to act rationally.

This might be a good thing to discuss with your neighbors, before the next terror hits… because it will."

Paul Rosenberg  May 21st, 2014
FreemansPerspective.com


More About "Onebornfree":

"Onebornfree" is a personal freedom consultant and a musician. He can be reached at: onebornfreeatyahoodotcom  .

Onebornfree  Blogs: 
                                                                                         
 Onebornfree's Financial Safety blog[ Investment philosophy blog]

Onebornfree's 9/11Research Review blog[ A personal review of the state of 9/11 research]


The Freedom Network [ home page for the Freedom Network]

The Problem-Solver [Personal Freedom consulting]

Music Info: 

Onebornfree's [aka Fake-Eye D"] Music channel [Studio mixes + live solo recordings]

Fake Eye D's soundCloud channel [ no videos, so faster download]

6 comments:

  1. It's called infiltration OBF. Infiltration of all sides, setting the parameters of the dialectic and then playing all sides against the middle. When did this tribe-member Rosenberg become the new Harry Browne? And what a big surprise that he's pushing the fear-based mind-control, huh? Not to me, and not to the Jew-wise. It's not that all Jews are like this or that all genetic Jews follow the criminal codes of the Talmud and the Torah against non-Jews (read Bobby Fischer, Benjamin Freedman, Myron Fagan, etc.) but that far too many of them do and have done it far too many times in far too many countries to be trusted half as much as any other group, although it is good policy not to trust anyone of any ethnicity with a big platform in any type of media without becoming paranoid. Just recently, 93% of all Israelis supported the massacre thousands of Palestinians as payback for 2 missing Israelis. What would you call that, another secret plan based on faked statistics to set-up the forever-suckered 'front-men,' kicked out of 109 territories simply for being 'smarter' than others, the chosenites? If you were a Palestinian, would you ever trust any Jew of any stripe, religious or not, ever again? Of course not and you would be fully justified.

    Larry Silverstein, Steven Rosenbaum, Joel Meyerowitz, Michael Chertoff, Matt Lauer, Rick Leventhal, Howard Lutnick, Charles Hirsch, Kenneth Feinberg, Alvin Hallerstein, etc. What do they all have in common? Being too stupid to avoid being manipulated by Abirato's ridiculous "Off Chessboard Entities" (lol)? I don't think so.

    ~ Negentropic MK I

    ReplyDelete
  2. Also, reading the Fetzer comments section, it seems you're a bit confused about Hitler being a Christian or not. He was not a Christian in the devout sense at all, although the Christian Identity nutjobs that have infested Fetzer's gatekeeping blog and the rest of the internet would like to convince everyone that he was, just because, as a politician, he was not stupid enough to offend the main allegorical mystical fantasy or hope-con of the masses of the German peoples he was engaged in leading. To understand Hitler's real views, you have to read "The Table Talks" where he speaks about everything under the sun, including religion, unguardedly, safe within his inner circle:

    "Hitler's Table Talks" are genuine and have been authenticated by David Irving himself.

    "About Hitler’s Table Talk

    Hitler’s Table Talk is a series of informal, private conversations between Hitler and his closest associates, as recorded by Martin Bormann. David Irving assures us that they are genuine and that he has seen the original German transcripts all signed by Bormann as accurate. Albert Speer in any case confirmed the authenticity of the German transcripts, which were published in 1951 as Tischgespräche im Führerhauptquartier. David Irving also assures us that the English language version from which we have quoted in this our Hitler Against Christianity is “expertly, and literately, translated.”

    David Irving:

    “Hitler’s Table Talk is the product of his lunch- and supper-time conversations in his private circle from 1941 to 1944. The transcripts are genuine.

    The table talk notes were originally taken by Heinrich Heim, the adjutant of Martin Bormann, who attended these meals at an adjacent table and took notes. (Later Henry Picker took over the job). Afterwards Heim immediately typed up these records, which Bormann signed as accurate. [...]

    For forty years or more no German original was published, as Genoud told me that he feared losing the copyright control that he exercised on them. I have seen the original pages, and they are signed by Bormann.

    They were expertly, and literately, translated by Norman Cameron and R.H. Stevens, though with a few (a very few) odd interpolations of short sentences which don’t exist in the original—the translator evidently felt justified in such insertions, to make the context plain. [...]

    The Table Talks’ content is more important in my view than Hitler’s Mein Kampf, and possibly even more than his Zweites Buch (1928). It is unadulterated Hitler. He expatiates on virtually every subject under the sun, while his generals and private staff sit patiently and listen, or pretend to listen, to the monologues.”

    Hitler thought that Christianity was a gutless religion and not heroic enough like Islam.

    "Only in the Roman Empire and in Spain under Arab domination has culture been a potent factor. Under the latter, the standard of civilisation attained was wholly admirable; to Spain flocked the greatest scientists, thinkers, astronomers and mathematicians of the world, and side by side there flourished a spirit of sweet human tolerance and a sense of the purest chivalry. Then, with the advent of Christianity, came the barbarians. The chivalry of the Castilians has been inherited from the Arabs. Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers—already, you see, the world had fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing was Christianity!—then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies heroism and which opens the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so. " - Hitler's Table Talk - 28th August 1942, midday"

    https://archive.org/details/HitlersTableTalk


    ~ Negentropic MK II

    ReplyDelete
  3. . . . (continued)

    "National Socialism and religion cannot exist together — No
    persecution of religions, let them wither of themselves —
    Bolshevism, the illegitimate child of Christianity — Origin of
    the Spartan gruel — The Latvian morons — Stalin, one of
    history's most remarkable figures.

    When National Socialism has ruled long enough, it will no
    longer be possible to conceive of a form of life different from
    ours.

    In the long run. National Socialism and religion will no
    longer be able to exist together.

    On a question from C. S., whether this antagonism might mean a
    war, the Fuehrer continued:

    No, it does not mean a war. The ideal solution would be to
    leave the religions to devour themselves, without persecutions."

    All quotes are taken from Hitler’s Table Talk 1941-1944: His Private Conversations, translated by Norman Cameron and R.H. Stevens, Enigma Books, New York, 2000.

    https://archive.org/details/HitlersTableTalk


    ~ Negentropic MK III

    ReplyDelete
  4. @my own first comment

    My bad on the first comment. Thought that this Rosenberg guy was pushing the fear-meme skimming the article, realized too late that he was against the fear-meme when I read the whole thing.

    Hey, maybe this guy is another Bobby Fischer, Benjamin Freedman or Myron Fagan, or maybe a Rothbard-type who'll never admit that National Socialism was an economic success in the 1930's. Either way, I still don't trust him and never will, not even across the street. Do you know why? Jews run damage control in all areas, including the far reaches of the conspiracy community and the fear-meme, just so suckers will always think that Jews, as a group, do not conspire together and ignore the group behaviors in favor of the individual. I agree that individuals should not be persecuted because of belonging to this or that group, but that doesn't take away the fact that GROUP BEHAVIORS of a vicious kind, seeking to control billions of people through media-fear-mongering should be ignored and claimed to be invalid simply because ONE individual such as a Fischer, Freedman, Fagan, etc. comes forward and speaks out against it.

    I'll reserve judgment on this Rosenberg guy until I read more of his opinions aside from this anti-fear-meme article which could just be damage control against too much anti-Jew sentiment in the alt-media. There have been other people like him, for example Len Horowitz and Nathaniel Kapner, who have proven to be quite bizarre and untrustworthy. We'll see.


    ~ Negentropic MK IV

    ReplyDelete
  5. P.S.

    None of these libertarians, not a single one that I've seen, has ever taken a position of truth on the holohoax, despite the fact that 19 countries now, including Italy and Russian, have banned holycost denial, clearly a free speech issue. They might say that 'free speech should be allowed,' but they'll never have the balls to take a position themselves..

    So just by running the holohoax litmus, you can easily find out if this Rosenberg guy or anyone else doing any sort of 'limited-hangout' is for real or not.

    As easy as 'abc.'

    And let me add this: I'll bet you 20 bucks right now that this guy will never admit the holohoax, the way that Clues Forum and Fetzer both have (limited hangout on Fetzer's part) not even go as far as another bizarre character, David Cole. If you can prove me wrong, you've got 20 bucks coming.

    ~ Negentropic MK V

    ReplyDelete
  6. Correction:

    'not even go as far as another bizarre character, David Cole' should be "never mind go as far as another bizarre character, David Cole."

    Of course, each level of knowledge gatekept has its own rules of limited hangout. What Fetzer has to do to gain "street-cred" in his limited-hangouts if far different than what a guy like Rosenberg or Ace Baker or Dylan Avery might do. All mega-shill Avery has to do is go posture with "We Are Change" and all Willie Rodriguez has to do is go on tour with a bogus 9-11-truth road show and go on Alex Jones in the pre-Charlie-Sheen days (not anymore, he's too exposed now to show his face around too much. But, lo and behold, Monsieur Fetzer and Kevin Barrett both sing the praises of Senor Rodriguez, the 'heroic janitor' or the Carlos Arredondo of 9-11, don't they? lol And with Fetzer's pal Barrett even having obvious actor Bob McIlvane on without asking him a single hard question, we of all people, 9-11 truthers hip to media-fakery, can see a limited-hangout for what it is on EVERY single level it's practiced on, whether within Barrett's plane-hugging or Fetzer's hologram-nuke-hugging.


    ~ Negentropic MK VI

    ReplyDelete