Friday, September 20, 2013

9/11 Scams: The Faked "Award Winning" Amy Sancetta WTC2 "Tilt" Photo + Clones


                         Fig. 1                                                              Fig. 2

Fig.s  1 + 2 . Left Image Credited to "Amy Sancetta" of the Associated Press. [Click on images to enlarge]

Q: does smoke really form in 2 almost perfectly straight lines  at a 90 degree angle, in real life?  

More WTC 2  "Tilt Photo" Smoke Shenanigans:


 Fig.3  "you forgot to comp the streetlight & flagpole."'dont matter, cloned the tree & dustcloud instead..."  [Above gif file comp and humorous comments by "Reel Deal" @] [Click on image to enlarge]




Fig. 4: ReelDeal Gif overlay repeated[cloned] smoke pattern x 3 on left of picture, trees added, lightpole & flagpole[?] missing.  [Click on images to enlarge]

9 Or 10 Other Sancetta-Like Photos?

There are, at this time at least 8 or 9 [possibly 10] other examples suspiciously similar to the Sancetta image, meaning, we are supposed to believe that at least 8 or 9, or more, pro photographers [or "amateurs"?]  were all miraculously standing in almost the exact same spot relative to WTC2  on 9/11 and all of them managed to click their shutters at the exact same moment in time to capture the start of the collapse of WTC2. Here is a still from a video allegedly shot by one "Ben Reisman", for example:

                                    Ben Reisman Vs. Amy Sancetta Images:

Fig. 5 Ben Reisman                    Fig. 6 Amy Sancetta

                            [Click on images to enlarge]

Q: Try making a screen shot from the Reisman still that successfully excludes the lamp-post, and yet still includes the exact same portion of the pyramid-shaped roof and gold ball on top for the [lower]building situated directly in front of the black building, as is seen in the second photo [Sancetta]. Good luck with that! 

Still Not Convinced Something's A Little "Off" Here?:

Now if that does not convince you that something is wrong- I understand, after all it is possible that Sancetta was in front of the lamp-post when that shot was taken and that accounts for the difference. However: 

Here are 2 more "tilt" photos [ Nilsson and Samoilova] compared to the Sancetta photo by Simon Shack at

Lets compare them side by side :

[1] Amy Sancetta Vs Thomas Nilsson:

         Sancetta                                   Nilsson  
                     [Click on images to enlarge]

aaaand [2] Sancetta  Vs.  Samoilova: 


              Sancetta                                       Samoilova 
                          [Click on images to enlarge]

                   aaaaaaaaaand, Nilsson Vs, Samoilova                

Nilsson                                 Samoilova 
 [Click on images to enlarge]

aaaaaaaaand onebornfree's very own FREE, BONUS COMPARISON! : [4] Nilsson Vs. Reisman: 


                       Nilsson                                     Reisman

                            [Click on images to enlarge]

Are we there yet? 

Remember-  in the big picture, it's the sum of all the evidence that leads to an ultimate conclusion- not one piece of evidence in particular. 

Related links : 


Ben Riesman :

Thomas Nilsson: ... ering.html

Gulnara Samoilova:

Amy Sancetta: ... -prog.html


More about "Onebornfree"  :

"Onebornfree", or "O.B.F".  is the generic, 15+ year online business name for my internet persona and various entrepreneurial activities]:

 I am an alternative psychologist and alternative health/fitness consultant ,

Personal Freedom Consultant, 

 a Financial Safety Consultant

and a  musician [singer/guitarist, mostly blues/jazz stylings] and published songwriter.

See also: Onebornfree's  Mythbusters and Freedom Network blog 
[various articles]   

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

9/11 Scams:The Faked "Live" CNN WTC1 Collapse Footage

UPDATE : 05/23/17:

    IGNORE THIS POST! [ it will no longer make sense]


The above gif file, composed by Simon Shack  is a double speed record of  original archive of  CNN's supposedly "live" broadcast of WTC1's collapse on the morning of 9/11.[WTC2 having already allegedly collapsed by this time].

 [Update 09/19/13: CNN's remarkably well timed camera "zoom-in": it should be noted that prior to the collapse itself shown above, the CNN camera performs a remarkably prescient "zoom-in" from about 1 mile away to somewhere "up close and personal"- a camera "zoom-in" that remarkably stops at the exact same moment that the the towers disintegration starts. I have added Simon Shacks gif file of that remarkably prescient CNN "zoom-in" as an addendum to this post at the bottom of the page- onebornfree.]

You gotta hand it to that CNN studio editor- talk about fast reactions!

10 Second Collapse, Or Close To 20 sec.'s Shown Here?

Elsewhere it is often claimed that seismic records [or video footage even] indicate a total collapse time for WTC1 of 10 sec.s or even less, that is, the whole 500,000 ton steel and concrete building allegedly collapsed in about the same amount of time that it would take a billiard ball, dropped from the same height [1300 ft.], in a vacuum [i.e. no air resistance], to reach the ground [9.22 sec.s] 

But even an 18 sec total collapse time as depicted above is  impossible, in my opinion, unless via instantaneous [nuclear? direct energy ?] demolition of all parts of the entire structure is postulated, which are possibilities, I suppose, assuming the videos and photos  depicting the various tower collapses could be relied on as genuine evidence.

But they cannot be so relied on as genuine, in my opinion. 

This article presents a couple of reasons why it behooves a 9/11 investigator to distrust all of the original live tower collapse  imagery as shown on CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS , Fox, etc. 

Reason 1:  Amazing CNN Camera "Live"Editing!

 Regardless of alleged collapse time [ a minor distraction ultimately, I would say] , instead take note of the fact that according to this archived CNN footage, in the space of an allegedly live , sudden, unexpected total collapse of WTC1 in under 20 seconds, the studio editor [or whatever he/she is called] managed to switch camera angles  3, or possibly 4 times!

Cher-rist! Those guys were really good!

Reason 2: Horrendous Image Quality

Please also examine the appalling image quality on display here, [ e.g. see especially "Camera 3" and "Camera 4" feeds, screenshots below ], from cameras  equipped with lenses that routinely [circa 2001] cost anywhere from $8,000 to $20,000 ! 

 [ See related post on overall MSM 9/11 broadcast image quality, or lack thereof, here.]

Mr Shack's 2x speed gif was made from the original CNN 'live" footage archived here. 

[N.B. Mr Shack's files are in the original, higher resolution MPEG file format. Since he originally downloaded/copied those online archives, their format has been changed to the new, current, online lower resolution FLV format.]

    [Click on images to enlarge]


As a small reminder of what the quality of real pre 9/11 imagery looks like compared to those two CNN samples, see this example :

 [ For more examples of real , pre-9/11 photos, see related post on overall MSM 9/11 broadcast image quality, or lack thereof, here.

Regards, onebornfree.

Update 09/06/13:  Simon Shacks 2 gifs below contrast the collapse imagery taken by one "Etienne Sauret", with that of  MSNBC .

 As both sequences commence, please note the tiny white building situated on the top right corner of  WTC1's roof. Also note the identical smoke patterns. 

And yet the WTC1's antenna appears to fall in opposite directions in these two sequences:

Addendum/update 09/19/13 : CNN's Remarkable Zoom-In Prior To WTC1's Collapse:

Gif by Simon Shack,

Note how this shot/sequence starts miles away from the tower, then does one long zoom-in to the tower that stops A SPLIT-SECOND before the collapse commences! Yet another remarkable camera zoom coincidence [there are many in the "live" archived 911 feeds.