Part 2 of Richard Hall's 2010, 6 part interview concerning 9/11 live media fakery, with Andrew Johnson
Post update: [ 06/18/17]: Whoops! It appears I made a mistake with these recent two posts about the Hall/ Johnson interviews. My mistake was to assume that the 2015 video I saw on Youtube was the original. That being the case, I had then thought "well, there is hope for messrs. Hall/ Johnson, yet", as they both seemed quite fair in their analysis of "September Clues" In other words, I assumed that Hall had now changed his mind and rejected his own 2012 "holographic plane image" theory.
In my previous post, I brought your attention to the fact that researcher Richard Hall had in 2012, with his holographic plane theory, completely contradicted his own earlier  statements about the plane paths not matching- as he had earlier concluded  that researcher Simon Shack had already clearly demonstrated that the plane paths of Fl. 175 did not in fact match up in the "live" 9/11 footage; as indeed I had myself pointed out back in 2012, shortly after Hall's hypothesis was first made public.
After studying the relevant footage in part 3 of 6 of Mr Hall's 2010 interview with Andrew Johnson [who appears to have been the person responsible for pointing out at that time, the incongruity of the flight paths within the original "live" broadcasts ], I decided to delve a little further into Mr. Hall's entire 6 part interview with Johnson, which originally appeared at Mr Hall's website: "9/11 TV footage and amateur video analysis"., back in June 2010.
And what do I then find, in part 2 [of 6] of the interview [video at top of this post] :
1: Hall Again Admitted That Plane Paths Do Not Match
First of all, at the very start of the video segment, Mr Hall again re-confirms the disparity of the plane paths, [as he does in more detail in part 3 of the interview], as he reviews a segment of Simon Shacks "September Clues" movie that clearly demonstrates 2 different plane paths seen on [even] just one station , NBC. [Let alone the fact that the paths do not match station to station.
Of the two contradictory NBC sequences Hall says:
" This to me is the smoking gun" [at 3.00 to 3.05] and: "that is actually from the same camera, so they've actually removed all of the background from that shot" [3:20-3:30].
See my previous post for more on the plane path issue.
2: Onwards and Upwards: the Hall/Johnson Analysis of "The Matrix Shot"
Starting at 6mins and 30 secs in the interview [posted above], and ending at the 8 mins 20 sec point, Messrs Hall and Johnson then review what Mr Shack had called "the Matrix Shot", i.e. Shack's astute observation that the exact same perspective view of the towers is seen inserted into the live feeds of all 5 MSM networks [ ABC, CBS,CNN, NBC, Fox], but, depending on the network, all 5 showed different back grounds and foregrounds, which again means that the imagery shown "live" that morning cannot have been genuine.
The "Matrix Shot": Hall/Johnson Admit Faked "Live" MSM Imagery and Network Collusion:
"..the matrix shot"......"all 5 networks appear to have used the same shot, but they've tried to make it look different, different colors, different foregrounds on there, different backgrounds.."
......and then: ".. so this suggests that all five networks were colluding somehow..."
Johnson: " That's what it looks like."
Moving On: The Original, "Live" MSM Tower "Collapse" Imagery:
At this point, An Important Question For Hall/Johnson etc.:
So, if they both admitted, all the way back in 2010, that the original "live" broadcast 9/11 imagery they reviewed in the show was not in fact genuine, but instead consisted of poorly composited fake imagery made to look like genuine imagery to the casual observer, and, although none of the footage examined in the interview showed the two actual tower "collapses" as shown on TV that morning, why would they [and many others] still, [as of 2017], blithely assume/insist that any actual, existing, archived MSM "live broadcast imagery " of the two tower collapses themselves was in any way genuine?
Two Important Facts That Hall/Johnson May Not Be Aware Of :
Fact  : While all 5 networks [ABC, CBS,CNN, NBC, Fox] broadcast wholly faked imagery of a plane hitting WTC2 [as Hall/Johnson originally seemed to agree] ................
.[.......see Simon Shack's "Synched Out" analysis of the original, "live" plane hit footage..................]
......... Fact : Only 1 of each of the 5 networks actually claims to have captured the "live" collapse of a WTC tower.
The WTC 2 "Live" Collapse Footage:
The first tower to go [WTC2] was caught "live" only on NBC:
ABC, CNN, CBS and Fox all mysteriously missed that allegedly "live" event [at least it's missing from the official on-line "live" archives for those 4 networks]
Question, dear reader : does this NBC "live" sequence really seriously look like genuine live imagery to you?
The WTC1 "Live" Collapse Footage:
The second tower to go [WTC1] , was seen "live" only on CNN:
ABC, CBS NBC and Fox all mysteriously missed that event [at least it's missing from their official on-line archives for these 4 networks].
Question, dear reader : does this CNN "live", on archive sequence, complete with miraculously timed camera "zoom-ins" [that end at the exact moment that the tower starts its collapse],and 3x camera/viewpoint live studio edits in the space of around 17 secs of a totally unexpected collapse, seriously look like genuine live imagery to you?
See also Simon Shacks excellent "The "WTC Collapse" Animation Sequences" presentations of the tower collapse imagery
Attention!, Messrs. Hall and Johnson [and others too numerous to mention]:
That's right, no other original better quality, less fake-looking, "live" broadcast tower collapse imagery of the demise of WTC1 and 2 exists! [only those two short sequences on archive and displayed/linked to here, above]
Again, [in case you missed it the first time :-) ] : these two clips above are the only two extant, official, live, MSM recordings of the "collapses" [or whatever you want to call them], of WTC 1 and 2, that can be found within the official MSM on-line archive for all 5 US TV stations.
For example, this somewhat famous photo of WTC1, [used by various 9/11 "researchers" to "prove" that the towers were destroyed top-down by this, or by that], which , according to online reverse-image search app. "TinEye", did not even appear until 2007 in an on-line newspaper in the far east [of all places], has nothing to do with the original "live" broadcast tower collapse imagery of WTC1's collapse, as shown "live" on CNN [see above] that morning:
Fig. 1. A supposedly "genuine" image of WTC1 apparently exploding, "top-down".
Important Questions For Hall, Johnson Etc.:
1] Are Messrs Hall and Johnson and associated now going to claim, with straight faces mind you, that either of those two official MSM sequences of the collapses of WTC1 and 2 shown above are somehow genuine?
2] Or, perhaps, that a photo of WTC1 collapsing/exploding that appeared mysteriously in a Far East online newspaper fully 6 years after the event [fig.1] is genuine, while the original live NBC and CNN sequences of WTC1 and 2's collapses are fake?
3] Or perhaps [shock, horror, egads ! ] , that the 2 video sequences of the tower collapses , and the photo above, plus others like it, are all fakes?
Inquiring minds want to know ! :-)
And while we're on the subject, here are two more excerpts from the original "live" MSM broadcast feeds of the morning of 9/11 that also clearly illustrate the fact that that original "live" footage we saw that day was not in any way, shape or form, actual live imagery, but instead , poorly fabricated digital imagery produced entirely via computers, pre- 9/11, then broadcast as "live" imagery on the morning of 9/11:
1] "The Incredible Moving Verrazzano Bridge: [ bridge is impossibly big, plus it still moves while background/foreground remain stationary]:
2] "The Spinning Towers" : [towers magically turn to face the camera lens as it circles around them]:
Other onebornfree links:
Personal Freedom Consulting