Sunday, February 16, 2014

Why Jim Fetzer /Richard Hall/Ace Baker etc. Are Wrong About This Fl.175 Video [Hezarkhani]

                                                    Image 
              Fig.1: short gif clip- image detail from the full, original Michael Hezarkhani video shown on CNN on 09.12/01                   

One Easy To See Reason Why The Hezarkhani Fl.175 Video [Above] Is   100% Computer-Faked.

[N.B.Update 03/26/14: this post originally contained 2 examples that   raised serious questions about the authenticity of the Hezarkhani video. One has now been removed until I can firmly establish whether or not it is factually relevant- regards, obf.]


Introduction:

Below is an example of a very simple imagery analysis that conclusively proves that the famous Michael Hezarkhani video of Flight 175 crashing into the WTC South Tower is a 100% digital fabrication manufactured wholly via computer simulation, and not a real live movie with  just a plane image inserted later , as Ace Baker [Colin Alexander] contends, nor is it a genuine movie with a projected holographic plane image captured in real time, as Richard Hall and  Prof. Jim Fetzer  contend. 



A Perfect Example Of Exactly What's Missing From Nearly All So- Called 911 Research!

Far  more importantly, this analysis serves  as  an excellent , simple example of the type of detailed imagery analysis that is, sadly, completely missing from the so-called 911 " scientific research"  of  persons such as Prof. Jim Fetzer, Ace Baker, Richard Hall, Judy Wood, Andrew Johnson, Morgan Reynolds, and organizations such as "We Are Change", "Loose Change", "Pilots For 9/11 Truth", "Architects and Engineers For 911 Truth" etc. etc. [ad infinitum]

Naming The Guilty 

All of these persons and organizations listed above, as well as others not listed, are guilty as charged of elevating entirely unexamined/unverified  imagery [i.e. any/all alleged 9/11 imagery cited by themselves or others-  videos and still photos- including, but not limited to the here briefly reviewed Hezarkhani video], to the level of "genuine evidence" without ever having performed anything like the simple investigative procedures demonstrated in the example given here, or other, similarly related imagery verification tests. 

Symptomatic

In fact, this complete lack of any serious  concerted effort towards imagery verification by 9/11 "researchers" before citing that imagery as being " conclusive evidence" [of whatever] , is symptomatic of 99% of the 9/11 "research/truth" community, including all of those claiming some sort of scientific educational background! 

"A Prima Facie" Claim?

Indeed Professor Jim Fetzer, and others associated with him have gone as far as to specifically claim that  imagery like this [ and more specifically, the alleged "live" 911 US network broadcasts], has "a prima facie" justification to be regarded as genuine by any/all "legitimate" 9/11 researchers, and that the simple tests illustrated here [and similar] are not even procedurally necessary for the investigating 9/11 "scientist" !  [N.B. although never broadcast "live", as the MSM broadcasts were all claimed to be, the Hezarkhani clip was shown on CNN and elsewhere shortly after the events of 9/11.]

With all that I hereby submit: 

A Simple To Understand  Reason Why The Hezarkhani Video Is 100% Computer-Faked:

 The "Teardrop" "Fl.175 Stationary Plane Image" Analysis:


                             user posted image

 Fig.2 :Part of the Hzarkhani video with a line drawn in the exact center of sequential frames

Building Moves- Plane Stationary! 

 The short, gif Hezarkhani video analysis above is an older [2007 or 8, if I remember correctly] analysis [by "teardrop"],  of the last few frames of the Hezarkhani video. 

Notice that the tail of the plane remains exactly centered in the consecutive frames [red line], and that in reality, in this segment of the video, it is  the building image that moves towards the plane image from right to left , and not the plane image moving towards the building image from left to right as it should be, and  that that moving building image is what creates the optical illusion that the plane image is still moving toward the WTC2 building.


The plane  image is supposedly moving at over 500 mph across screen. 



Fact: 500 mph Objects Are Impossible To Track With Hand Operated Cameras



The simple fact is  that it is impossible for a camera held by an individual to accurately track an object moving at that speed, not without significant image blur from frame to frame.  



If you don't believe me [understandable], try asking  a professional sports photographer who has to photograph Formula 1 race cars  for a living,  cars which routinely travel at about one third of the alleged speed of the plane image in the Hezarkhani video - and they'll tell you the cars are impossible to accurately track at that speed [ 100+ mph]. 



This means that any/all 9/11 videos showing, and successfully tracking, from fairly close up, a plane moving across the sky,  where the camera operator is forced to track the plane image via "panning" the camera to keep it in view, and does so successfully [i.e without significant image blur], are fakes.  To do so  successfully [no blur] is physically impossible. 

And furthermore,  to keep the 500 mph plane image perfectly centered for several frames[as  it is been so miraculously tracked  is _doubly_ impossible.

Hezarkhani Video allegedly Shot From the Deck of a Boat !

 It is also worth bearing in mind that the Hezarkhani video was allegedly shot with a hand held camera, from the deck of a boat; that is, an unstable platform environment. 


Postscript: 


The Michael Hezarkhani video that allegedly depicts what happened when Flight 175  struck the South face of WTC2, is one of the most famous of the  911 "plane into building" videos, most likely because it was shown on mainstream networks shortly after the alleged events of 911, on CNN. 

Variations On A Theme

Jim Fetzer, Ace Baker and Richard Hall all contend that except for the plane image itself, the Hezarkhani video is genuine. 

 Variation 1: that is, Hall and Fetzer contend that the buildings shown in the Hezarkhani video and others like it are genuine, live, "real time"  images , while the plane image itself is a holographic image [ projected via an invisible, "cloaked" military plane flying alongside the holographic projection], captured in real time by the alleged photographer [Hezarkhani]. 

Variation 2:

 If I understand him correctly, Baker, unlike Hall, claims that the plane image is instead  an "insert", that is, a plane image that was later [i.e. post real time filming]inserted into an otherwise live filming of an explosion occurring on the south face of WTC2. 

Concluding Observations:     

1]: Like 99% of "9/11 researchers", neither Hall , Fetzer Or Baker have ever made any even half-way serious attempt to closely examine  either the Hezarkhni video , nor any other alleged live 9/11 video or photo, in the simple yet revealing manner depicted via the example shown here . 

2] More importantly, it can be safely concluded that NONE of the alleged 9/11 imagery, regardless of source, can be trusted. All of it would need to be thoroughly analyzed using both the methodologies briefly illustrated here as well others related, BEFORE any  alleged 9/11 videos or still photos could be  seriously used as "irrefutable evidence" to support any "9/11- what really happened" hypothesis. 

Regards, onebornfree.

More About "Onebornfree":

"Onebornfree" is a personal freedom consultant a problem solver, and a musician. He can be reached at: onebornfreeatyahoodotcom  .

Music Info: 

Onebornfree's [aka Fake-Eye D"] Music channel
 

Home studio recording example "Somewhere Over The Rainbow Blues":Youtube link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2oS9iI2zWU

Live solo example [own composition "Dreams [Anarchist's Blues]:


Youtube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0o-C1_LZzk


Onebornfree Personal Freedom Blogsites: 
                                                                                         




16 comments:

  1. A perfect example of anonymous blogging - muddling up and distorting facts. Congratulations!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Absolutely right Andrew. How can we take these people seriously who put all sorts of so-called facts and opinions on blogs when they can't even use their real identities or real names. I know I can't take them seriously at all. most of the material here is full of falsehoods, and lack any real evidence based facts.
      Delete

      Delete
    3. Sure, "Mark", sure. Did you know your attempt at refutation lacked any real evidence based facts?
      Delete.

      Delete
  2. lol

    You were visited by Judy Wood's main groupie, OBF, you must be doing something right. The KING KONG man has completely destroyed the very last shreds of Judy Wood's credibility and poor Andy has no one that will listen to him anymore about how "real" the jumpers and vicsims and buildings were and that silly hologram nonsense he's pushing with his supposed opponent Fetzer.

    Maybe he can have Bob McIlvane on like Jim-I-had-dinner-with-Willie-Rodriguez-he's-on-the-level-Fetzer's still-plane-hugging buddy Kevin Barrett recently did

    http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2014/03/the-kevin-barrett-show-20140311.html

    and sit down and grieve with him over his "dead son," never asking a single challenging question such as, well, why isn't your dead son's name on the Social Security Death Index, Bob?

    Can you imagine the performance he might have prepared that would follow? The "outrage" he would pretend to show at Barrett's "offensive" question?

    But, of course, McIlvaine (or whatever his real name is) knows Barrett will not ask him ANY tough questions at all, or else he wouldn't be appearing on this Muslim shill's show in the first place.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aPvJSQtmoE

    The way these level of shills establish their street-cred is by pointing to Israel. Now Jews and dual-citizen Israelis DO own and control most of the media

    http://k007.kiwi6.com/hotlink/wgyudeybm0/Who_controls_your_mind_2013.jpg

    and through their control of usury and legalized counterfeiting in banking sit at the top of the power structure

    http://jewishracism.blogspot.com/2009/03/1-bestseller-proves-that-usury-is.html

    so by pointing to them, these types of guys Kevin Barrett, Christopher Bollyn, Daryl Bradford Smith, Alan Sabrosky, etc., establish the street-cred necessary among the somewhat more hardcore truthers to be able to gatekeep the HOW.

    "The objective of disinformation is not to convince you of one point of view or another, it is to create enough uncertainty so that everything is believable and nothing is knowable. " -- Jim Fetzer

    ~ Negentropic MK I

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous poster, I can't take you seriously at all. Where your courage to use you real name and stand up and be counted for your opinion. Just may be when people start to grow some I might take you all seriously, but for now..... I can't when you hide away in shadows. End of.

      Delete
    2. You should be embarrassed to use your real name, if that is your real name, typing such lame ad hominem crap. Try presenting a logical argument, you stupid shill.

      Delete
  3. (continued from previous post)

    Disinfo = Uncertainty = Dis-traction = Loss of Traction

    Loss of traction actually happens when those with the wherewhital to be leaders are wittingly or unwittingly led by people like Alex Jones, Eric Hufschmid, Daryl Bradford Smith, Christopher Bollyn, Alan Sabrosky, Mark Glenn, Michael Collins Piper, Jeff Rense, to be distrustful of WHO did the ‘false-flag’ operation but fully accepting of the HOW, which always incorporates a fear-mongering death-&-destruction meme. Beyond that there are also gatekeepers of the HOW like Judy Wood, Don Fox and Ace Baker (direct agent or useful ego/idiot the result is the same) incorporating what? Yes, you guessed it: more fear-mongering and death-&-destruction memes: nukes, mini-nukes and beam-weapons that can pulverize 100 story buildings into find dust! The answer of the people wittingly or unwittingly pushing the fear-&-paranoia-memes was always: they lied about WHO did it, we have now figured out WHO did it, the HOW is unimportant, never suspecting that maybe the perps did not care if people speculated on WHO did it and pointed fingers to people like Silverstein and whatnot as long as the HOW was kept obscure and they could continues using this HOW to repeat the conditioning of billions needed to be safe-and-secure in their rule.

    The troofers never suspected that the HOW would maybe show them that these big-bad evil fugs with trillions that never gave a second throught to starting wars and famines that killed millions didn’t do much of anything at all except PSYCHOLOGICALLY manipulate billions via Big Lies in IMAGERY that also continued the very same FEAR-MEME (via the imagery which they still trusted although they had long ago rejected the verbal transmissions) along somewhat different and more ‘sleuth-friendly’ paths in themselves. That in itself is so hard to believe that it serves as an impregnable buffer against most people understanding the HOW of their own manipulations.

    The question that always comes forth from conditioned paranoids whose egos as ‘hard-men’ get bitch-slapped by the realization that they may have been fooled by nothing more elaborate or ‘real-life’ than Hollywood productions is “Are you saying that they would have a problem killing 3000 people or 28 people when they never had a problem killing millions in wars and man-made famines and whatnot in the past?.”

    Well, the answer is both YES and NO. They obviously DO have a problem with killing 3000 people on 9-11 (or 28 people on Sandy Hook) because aside from the false-testimony of boo-hoo-hoo-on-cue ass-clown actors there is simply no proof that they did die, not even one body, autopsy or valid last address of residence for the the supposed 2970 (or whatever the latest number is, it keeps changing) on 9-11, and absurdly fake images of KING KONG men supposedly jumping from the buildings and others straight out of metal spandrells.

    http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2374833#p2374833

    and they obviously DON’T have a problem with killing way more than 3000 people because the many wars (with produceable corpses) have proven that, not to mention the myriad of ‘slow-kills’ of both body and soul operative in most of our current human societies at any one time, every last one of which has the extortion of taxation and violation of individual rights institutionalized and most of which have USURY and legalized counterfeiting also institutionalized. The cancer-racket alone kills over a million people a year worldwide (supposedly, statistics are NOT immune to manipulation by media-owners either) and almost everyone knows somebody that died from cancer (or rather the racket attached to its ‘treatment’).

    ~ Negentropic MK II

    ReplyDelete
  4. (continued from MK II)

    People (or at least the leaders of the people) have to learn a few simple (but elusive precisely because simple) things:

    1) That they are manipulated mainly through FEAR and that the majority of the alternative media wittingly or unwittingly also pushes the fear-meme on millions of people, therefore leaving them susceptible to manipulation from manufactured trauma, one sort for the average dupes, another for the niche market of ‘info-warriors’ and rebels of the same root source.

    2) That IMAGES cannot be trusted to be representations of real events PRIOR to authentication, especially if these images have been transmitted to you by the biggest liars and fraudsters in the history of the world: the mass-media. If you think your eyes alone are reliable to process faked imagery consider this batch:
    link to viralnova.com

    3) All the more-or-less true and smaller ‘confirmable’ news events that the media reports are only buttering you up and gaining your con-fidence for the one big FALSE one that they really need you to swallow (without insisting on independent confirmation) in order for their string-pullers behind the scenes to maintain their rule through trauma-induced fear-based conditioning. Know how a con-artist operates: a few truths followed by a lie that poisons that well and most important of all: extend this distrust to imagery even if that might short-circuit the ecstatic joys of conspiracy hobbyism or more accurately “movie criticism” and interpretation by self-appointed internet sleuths.

    4) That a ‘death’ transmitted to you as a real life event by the biggest liars and fraudsters in history is NEVER a death until YOU and/or a representative of yours in whom you place 100% trust can examine the actual corpse and confirm it. When your mother or cousin dies, you can confirm it. When the kid down the street goes to Iraq and dies in a shoot-out or comes back PTSD’d and crazy, you can confirm it. When somebody dies on a TV news report, you should never take their word for it and absent the ability to confirm, never bite on the fear-acid they want you to trip on. Laugh and ridicule them and make them WORK for their social engineering by actually having to go out and massacre real people and therefore ending up directly liable as murderers (directly here as well as indirectly overseas) as well as uber-fraudsters.

    My Shack/Clues thread over at DIF:

    http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1062031085&posted=1#post1062031085

    ~ Negentropic MK II


    Mencken: In Defense of Women - Full Audiobook:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atosY1lu_0Y

    Lysander Spooner

    Vices Are Not Crimes

    A Vindication Of Moral Liberty

    http://lysanderspooner.org/node/46

    Lysander Spooner- No Treason, The Constitution of No Authority - Audio File

    http://archive.org/download/NoTreasonTheConstitutionOfNoAuthority/LysanderSpooner-NoTreason-TheConstitutionOfNoAuthority.mp3

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks much for ur quite sensible analysis--the bldg. really does seem to move into the plane, and as u say, it's impossible for plane to travel at 500 mph--or anywhere near that speed--which is mere aerodynamic principle well-known by aviators, such speed only possible quite high-up in atmosphere where air is much thinner, allowing such cruise-speed. Thanks again. A.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I find it quite amazing that the scientist like Fox and Fetzer have not gone to the trouble of addressing this issue. This simple illustration blows their analysis of
    the Hezarkhani footage right out of the water. The fact that Fetzer is singing the same tune since Feb. 2014 is quite revealing.

    Either, he is just stubborn taking not looking at what you present. Meaning he is not allowing for All The Evidence to be part of the over all conclusion to form an hypothesis. Or he is just shilling.

    Thanks for your work OBF!

    ReplyDelete
  7. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJDDSPYQgQc#t=48 (REFERENCE TO FOLLOWING ONLY)
    Michael Hezarkhani Video is FAKE!

    0:54 This whole sequence is nothing but a computer "comp".

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/45413264@N04/16115938158/

    At 0:57, you can see the Whitehall Annex Building in the foreground ( with the "dome" top)
    The Whitehall Annex Building is 31 stories tall.
    Behind the Whitehall Annex Building, is the Downtown Club Building,( with a square top and 3 vertical "bands")
    The Downtown Club Building is 45 stories tall

    You're gonna need the following for reference:

    http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/wtc_p200003-1.jpg

    Tell me something. HOW does a 767 that is on a vector to crash in the area of floors 78-84 on Tower 2 FIRST manage to fly about 20 or so feet above a 31 STORY BUILDING (Whitehall Annex) and then proceed to fly BEHIND the TOP of a 45 STORY BUILDING, (Downtown Club) which is TALLER by 14 stories than the Whitehall Annex Building?

    NO WAY! The 767 would have CRASHED into the Downtown Club Building, somewhere in the area of the 30-33 floors. The wingtip would NOT go behind the top of the Downtown Club!

    Moving on, again on the same vector, the 767 proceeds to crash into floors 78-84 of Tower 2.

    Just at floor 78, Tower 2 is 47 floors above the Whitehall Annex Building. It is 33 floors above the Downtown Club Building.

    Now, HOW the hell, does one draw a straight line from the Whitehall Annex Building (31 Floors), to the Downtown Club Building (45 floors) to floor 78 of the Tower 2? There's no way that the government monkey boys can explain THIS one away.

    Michael Hezarkhani-YOU are a LIAR and a FRAUD and accessory to the greatest crime ever committed in modern times. I will make sure everyone knows this!

    http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/hezarkhani/

    Check this out too:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mT8UR0tHCU8

    ReplyDelete
  8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJDDSPYQgQc#t=48 (REFERENCE TO FOLLOWING ONLY)
    Michael Hezarkhani Video is FAKE!

    0:54 This whole sequence is nothing but a computer "comp".

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/45413264@N04/16115938158/

    At 0:57, you can see the Whitehall Annex Building in the foreground ( with the "dome" top)
    The Whitehall Annex Building is 31 stories tall.
    Behind the Whitehall Annex Building, is the Downtown Club Building,( with a square top and 3 vertical "bands")
    The Downtown Club Building is 45 stories tall

    You're gonna need the following for reference:

    http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/wtc_p200003-1.jpg

    Tell me something. HOW does a 767 that is on a vector to crash in the area of floors 78-84 on Tower 2 FIRST manage to fly about 20 or so feet above a 31 STORY BUILDING (Whitehall Annex) and then proceed to fly BEHIND the TOP of a 45 STORY BUILDING, (Downtown Club) which is TALLER by 14 stories than the Whitehall Annex Building?

    NO WAY! The 767 would have CRASHED into the Downtown Club Building, somewhere in the area of the 30-33 floors. The wingtip would NOT go behind the top of the Downtown Club!

    Moving on, again on the same vector, the 767 proceeds to crash into floors 78-84 of Tower 2.

    Just at floor 78, Tower 2 is 47 floors above the Whitehall Annex Building. It is 33 floors above the Downtown Club Building.

    Now, HOW the hell, does one draw a straight line from the Whitehall Annex Building (31 Floors), to the Downtown Club Building (45 floors) to floor 78 of the Tower 2? There's no way that the government monkey boys can explain THIS one away.

    Michael Hezarkhani-YOU are a LIAR and a FRAUD and accessory to the greatest crime ever committed in modern times. I will make sure everyone knows this!

    http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/hezarkhani/

    Check this out too:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mT8UR0tHCU8

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Apparently, the reason we can't move on from beating this very dead horse is because masses cannot be appealed to through reason.
      Greed and power obviously trump sanity. Any concern these psychopaths ought to have for the future of their own progeny is absent. Economic and political sea changes are inevitable. Let
      those of us who grasp this charming and exciting hoax move on to thinking and discussing how we might save our own skins and leave to our own descendants a saner and more sustainable planet.

      Delete
  9. It may not be possible to track something moving perpendicular to the camera at 500 MPH, but when the object is flying almost perfectly parallel to, and away from, the camera! It may be moving across the *sky* at 500MPH, but it's no longer moving across the *frame* at 500 MPH. ....*maybe* it's going 50MPH relative to the camera... I mean, seriously. Only someone who is convinced in advance by what they want to believe could read that argument and not immediately recognize that it's self-evidently absurd.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It may not be possible to track something moving perpendicular to the camera at 500 MPH, but when the object is flying almost perfectly parallel to, and away from, the camera! It may be moving across the *sky* at 500MPH, but it's no longer moving across the *frame* at 500 MPH. ....*maybe* it's going 50MPH relative to the camera... I mean, seriously. Only someone who is convinced in advance by what they want to believe could read that argument and not immediately recognize that it's self-evidently absurd.

    ReplyDelete