Question: As 9/11 research, is the Richard Hall hypothesis of any use to us at all ?
And let's not forget, he then falsifies the last part of the alleged genuine military data series by drawing an arbitrary, purely speculative purple line from that data's last given point to the face of WTC2, when no data apparently existed to justify extending that line!
Part 4- Fig. 1
Above still frame extracted from Simon Shack's "Nosed Out" examination of the original "live" Fox 5 footage below:
Part 4- Fig. 2
Coincidentally, in the 3rd part of his [Hall's] own video holographic plane presentation,Mr Hall addresses the very same Fox 5 footage sequence as examined by 9/11 researcher Simon Shack [above 2 image samples], and, whether out of ignorance or convenience, entirely dismisses it, completely sidestepping/neglecting to mention the abundantly clear evidence of a layer that runs top to bottom of that clip which occurs in the exact center of the frame , and thereby conveniently missing the point that ultimately it does not matter what the post-collision image really is meant to be -plane nose or dust/smoke - that image still becomes entirely flat as it runs up against the until then invisible layer . Conclusion: Mr Hall is either blind as a bat or deliberately obfuscating on this issue.
In 9/11 video imagery these are most commonly found around the plane image itself.
If you watched the video in part 3 of this analysis entitled " 9/11 TV Fakery: The Hezarkhani File" , you will have already seen a clear demonstration of a pixel cloud [and therefor of video fakery].
Here are two more other clear plane image pixel-cloud examples:
Part 4- Fig. 3
Mr Hall claims that all of the various video flight paths for Fl. 175 matched.
Here are yet two more glaring exceptions that refute that claim [both gifs made by Simon Shack]. Notice that for the last 7 seconds of Fl. 175 as shown in both sequences, one depicts an almost completely level approach, while the other [CBS- clip 20 in the Hall analysis], shows the plane image angling downward in its own last 7 sec. approach:
Part 4- Fig. 5
"Meanwhile, back at the ranch"..., err.., I mean, on the other side of the "pond", the BBC aired a sequence that shows Fl. 175 mysteriously lifting upward in its final moments:
FINAL ASCENT - as aired on the BBC:
Part 4- Fig. 6
More Fakery Clues: Contradictory Sunlight/ Shadows:
Part 4- Fig. 8
[both above illustrations courtesy Simon Shack]
The Sum of All the Evidence ?
Youtube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0o-C1_LZzk