This post was prompted by a recent short, but very revealing quote [see above] from an email exchange I had with Alexander "Ace"Baker [aka Colin Alexander] because we both are apparently on the same 9/11 e-mail group list somehow [I'm not even sure how I even got on the list ].
I first came across the 9/11 research of one "Ace" Baker in around 2007, when I was first exposed to his analysis of the still controversial "live" Fox5 TV broadcast that appeared to show Fl.175 [ie the 2nd 9/11 plane], penetrating, and then emerging, nose-cone still miraculously intact, on the opposite side of WTC 2.
Mr Bakers original frame by frame analysis of that Fox5 sequence can still be viewed here [although I could not get the frame advance button to work for me].
My Negative Comments and Conclusions Regarding "Anarcho-Libertarian"Ace Bakers 9/11 Research Conclusions In This Post:
Video "Expert" Baker Believes The 9/11 Televised Destructions of WTC1, 2 and 7 Were Genuine Live Broadcasts.
He Appears To Be a Very Poor "Expert" Videographer
Anyhoo, 'nuff said, and moving right along to my main points.......
Ace Baker Versus 1996's "Independence Day":
In 1996, the Hollywood movie "Independence Day" was released, replete with 100% CGI produced building explosion/collapse scenes such as this one :
Here is the overall "level of realism depicted" in a still frame from "Independence Day":
Remember, the Youtube clip above is from a Hollywood movie released five years before the events of 9/11, and that as regards computer software and technology advancements, Moore's Law states that : "over the history of computing hardware, the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit doubles approximately every two years."
Meaning that because of ongoing technological innovation, computer power and capabilities effectively doubles about every two years.
Meanwhile, Supposedly"Live" On TV, On 9/11:
By way of comparison, here is the "level of realism depicted" in two stills taken from the original 9/11 TV broadcast archives, allegedly with their state of the art "best in the world", MSM cameras:
Fig. 2: Had too much to drink? Are we seeing double yet? [And "dig" the squared smoke patterns to the right of the North tower antenna :-) ].
Fig.3: X-Ray vision, anyone? See through buildings?Is that a see-through spire seen above in this detail from a 9/11 live MSM broadcast? Or are you going to dismiss it as a sunlight reflection?
First of all, notice the very clear upgrade in detail seen in the "Armageddon" clip and stills versus what can be seen in the two year earlier movie "Independence Day; remember, these "Armageddon"examples are from a Hollywood movie still released 3 years before the events of 9/11, and that as regards computer software and technology advancements, Moore's Law states that :
"over the history of computing hardware, the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit doubles approximately every two years."
Regarding the reliablity of Mr Baker's original 9/11 research on the Fox5 sequence, here is a still from the on-line archived Fox 5 live broadcast footage:
Hollywood CGI, 1998